Because RB provides the Sleep() method and this is the best design - instead
of using a relatively unrelated Timer...
Am 02.01.2007 um 18:34 schrieb Dixon, Tom:
Why not have the thread just end by starting a timer instead of sleeping
and looping back through?
I'v had a similar problem. It looks like it has been fixed in
RB2007r1. My app doesn't hang anymore when quit (MacTel).
Dan
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
