On Jan 02, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote:
Seems to me that once they add an ability to create dynamic
libraries from
RB it would be a very small extra step to allow RB code to be used
to create
RB plugins, since of course RB plugins are themselves merely DLLs
written in
a particular way to a specific API.
Using RB to create a library or plugin for anther tool, like
Photoshop, makes some sense
But using RB to create plugins for RB makes less sense as far as I
can tell
Write a class/module etc and use that or encrypt one and ship that or
ship the source with a license agreement about it
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
