Yes, by user, I meant the RB user. Understanding the stack is one
thing, but having to wade through lots of methods and events to which
we have no access is another. I would like to have the same list as
is presented in the debugger's call stack popup menu.
As to working without "Include Function names" being turned on, are
you sure of your findings? I could not it get it work with that
option off, at least in 2007r1.
--Peter
On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Massimo Valle wrote:
On 07/gen/07, at 20:10, Peter Truskier wrote:
What is the best way to pare down the "stack" array to include
only those event and mehod names of which the user is aware, and
to render them in user-friendly text?
The user?
If you are not writing a developer tool, the user shouldn't be
aware of any method.
However if you target user is a developer, it should understand the
stack anyway.
But you are true, the method names are a bit unreadable.
As a complement to the above, I noticed that the
RuntimeException.stack works even if the "Include function names"
flag is not enabled.
I tried to build an UB target (RB 2006r4) with and without function
names and the binary size is exactly the same.
Is this a bug?
Massimo Valle
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
