On Feb 01, 2007, at 22:31 UTC, Stefan wrote: > This might be true, but the vital point is: Due to what ever reasons, > RB isn't well suited to write a compiler, an RS being not able to > manage this task just proofs this.
Nonsense. RB would be a great language to write a compiler in, but if I were running a company, I wouldn't throw out a perfectly good, clean compiler just because it happened to be written in C++. As for what the RS team is using to develop the IDE, it seems to me there has been way too much assumption and wild speculation in this thread. Maybe they'll tell us, maybe they won't, but if they don't, it wouldn't be correct to assume that means anything at all. Best, - Joe -- Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place" http://www.verex.com/ _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
