On Feb 5, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Brendan Murphy wrote:
Joseph Nastasi wrote:
Great, but why would you expect that RS needs to take that into
consideration? It's a shame that it's no longer an advantage to you
but, RS will hardly fold over this. Whereas they might fold if the
product becomes less stable...
I think what you are trying to say is not relevant to the
discussion because people are not arguing that they are going to
stop using RB, but the opposite in that they feel passionately
about using RB and people really like the NUG and RS is poking a
hot stick into our eye for bogus reasons.
The NUG actually helps the quality of RB since people discuss bug
reports and feature requests and bring some semblance of thought
to the process. Without the NUG there will be less voting on bugs
and feature requests because they won't be seen so in turn has
less information to help them do their job. This flies in the face
of what you are saying.
People are upset with this decision because RS is basically
killing off the NUG for their own comfort. They are not looking to
solve the problem, but chose a solution that cost them the least
effort. This is selfish on their part and just down right lazy and
stupid.
And if you choose the easy path, forever will the Dark Side dominate
your destiny... :)
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
REAL Software has decided to consolidate this mailing list with the
online Forums. On Monday, February 12, 2007, this mailing list
will no longer be active. We encourage you to continue your
REALbasic and REAL SQL Server discussions on the Forums. If you
are not presently a member of the forum, please sign up today at
<http://forums.realsoftware.com>.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
