i kinda figured i wasn't the first to think of this ;-) Glad to see it's on RS's radar screen.
P. On 2/13/07, Daniel Stenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are already FRs in the system for this, so it is definitely something RS are aware of. On 14/2/07 01:07, "Peter K. Stys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering how difficult it would be for RB to re-compile only > those modules/windows/classes that were changed. Most of the time I > will change a line or two of code and wait 30 seconds for my large > project to recompile, then start all over. > > C compilers like Xcode keep track of which source files were changed > and only compile the new source. > > Is this asking too much? Surely RB could keep track of dependencies > and new changes and be smarter at compiling. This would speed > edit-build cycles at least 10-fold for larger projects. I'm sure this > has been thought of, I just wonder why it's not implemented. > > Peter. Regards, Dan _______________________________________________________ www.13flatFIVE.com The C++ <> REALbasic code migration specialists _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter K. Stys, MD Professor of Medicine(Neurology), Senior Scientist Ottawa Health Research Institute, Div. of Neuroscience Ottawa Hospital / University of Ottawa Ontario, CANADA tel: (613)761-5444 fax: (613)761-5330 http://www.ohri.ca/profiles/stys.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
