On Feb 19, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Craig A. Finseth wrote: > ... > first second and third objects. Hence for high level languages a 1 > based system makes the most sense. The first item has index 1, the > second items has index 2 and the size of the list equals its Count. > Banishes the off-by-one boundary problems. > > It's probably what you are used to: I find that 0-based stuff has no > off-by-one problems and I'm always finding that the 1-based strings in > RB cause me no end of headaches. > > Of course, RB's always-do-the-for-loop-once is a pain in the > *censored*, too.
To what problem are you referring? Charles Yeomans _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
