Le 7 mars 07 à 23:47 Soir, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: > This is worth clearing up, because you're not the only one confused by > it. A lot of people don't understand implicit instantiation at first. > The key point is that "Win1" is a function, not a simple > reference. Is > it all clear now?
Indeed, using the term "Function" makes much sense. Thank you for the patience of explaining that. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
