On 2007-04-06, at 05:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Most of them are not real issues, I'd say. > > Editfield: works great; was never intended to be a word processor, > but handles text entry and editing following platform standards very > nicely. >
(On Mac) Works great, what is that mean? So you mean that if I load a text file in about 3-5MB, the EditField works great or what? If we read the LR about EdiField, then we see a lot of features that meet our needs, absolute. But there is nothing about the limitations of 40KB or something like that. I understand that the EditField works great, if you use very small files. If I load a plain text file, without color that is 3MB in size, a default application with one window, one EditField use 178MB RAM Memory, is that great? If I select that text, the memory usage is about 190MB RAM. A 3MB text file is not big today, perhaps it was 1999. (TextWrangler use 28MB for the same file, with syntax coloring) Great could means a lot... in this case at least for the memory chip factories. (The scroll bar also have some issues with bigger files (2007r2)) So in this case "Great" means nothing.. But it could be interesting to know what type of files and size that works great. Have a nice weekend to you all, Sven E ----------------------- _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
