Your argument has some bugs in it: 1. It's a bit of a false dichotomy assuming that a basic syntax RAD development tool can't be marketed to both.
2. Equating low quality tools with hobbyists is ridiculous. Those that don't code for a living will frustrate more easily when things fall apart because it's often difficult to discern if the problem is with the machine or the machinist. ~joe On 4/6/07 2:36 PM, "Thom McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We had a very long conversation about RB's release quality on the > beta list *before* the release. > > I have a question which I may e-mail Geoff directly later: > > "Is target audience for REALbasic hobbyists, or professionals?" > > Because the price suggests professionals, yet the quality suggests > hobbyists. So which is it? > > -- > Thom McGrath, <http://www.thezaz.com/> > "You realize you've created God in your own image when God hates all > the same people you do." > > > On Apr 6, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Giovanni wrote: > >> Thanks Terry, I dont dislike RS, I just hate bad software. I am not >> saying I hate RB, it was late last night(6 AM) and things did not >> go as >> planned and ended up doing the protorype on VB.NET!!! >> >> So nothing is lost. But I would like to see the issues FIXED BEFORE >> any >> release. > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
