On Apr 12, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Frank Bitterlich wrote: > Do I understand this correctly - you can prevent an object from being > destroyed when the destructor is already executed? Hm. Interesting > concept. Offers a lot of possibilities. > > Would that mean the the Destructor will be called again when the last > reference is dropped again afterwards?
Yes and yes. Regards, Guyren G Howe Relevant Logic LLC guyren-at-relevantlogic.com ~ http://relevantlogic.com REALbasic, PHP, Ruby/Rails, Python programming PostgreSQL, MySQL database design and consulting Technical writing and training _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
