Of course I really meant "binary" or bit-field - not boolean :)
On 28/4/07 18:08, "Daniel Stenning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ( forget about octal, i'd rather have > boolean as an option instead ) Regards, Dan _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
