Intel. Same machine in fact. The only difference was the OS and RB application. No hard data mind you. Just subjective experience. Next time if the mood strikes I'll fiddle with some timings.
~joe On 5/16/07 10:48 AM, "Daniel Stenning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I could live with it if its only the PowerPC architecture that hasn't been > well optimised, but if it is slower even on OSX on Intel vs XP or Linux > then that is more of a surprise and worrying. > > > On 16/5/07 16:44, "JC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've had a few projects compiled to both mac and win. I never tested the >> times because it wasn't that important, but I noticed that the win >> application was a bit more responsive - more peppy. I figured it must have >> been something specific to my project, but it's interesting to hear someone >> else bring this up... >> >> ~joe >> >> >> On 5/16/07 10:24 AM, "Theodore H. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Try compiling the RB app, for Windows. RB is many times faster for >>> Win and Linux :( >>> >>> They've underoptimised the Mac end of things, like most developers >>> these days tend to do :( >>> >>> -- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: >> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> >> >> Search the archives: >> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> >> > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
