They probably have an internal count property, but you still have overhead for calling a method. If they did a full iteration count each time, I suspect the time difference would be much greater!
Math On 5/17/07, Daniel Stenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you saying that RB Ubound does an iterating count of the number of > elements each time ?? > > I would have thought that each RB array has an internal count "property" > that only gets modified as elements are added or removed, and this property > is what gets queried each time Ubound is called. I might be wrong but that > would seem the most efficient thing to do - at the cost of a single integer. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
