On 17-May-07, at 9:12 AM, Charles Yeomans wrote: >> Except the size can change :) > > In which case you should not use a for-next loop, in general :)
Agreed ... This is just one of those interesting side effects of re-evaluating the limit each time vs doing it once Careful choice of the right algorithm and the means to implement it is almost always the biggest initial speed up _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
