On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Alfred Van Hoek wrote: > > Based on the notion that the retInstance comes from the RB > environment, we really should not unlock it because once the event/ > interface method goes out of scope, RB will reduce the refcount on > the retInstance, right?
No, the event has already exited, and there is no further cleanup to be done. Both objects stored in byref parameters and return values must be unlocked to prevent leaking. HTH, Jon _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
