The RealForum is an email discussion group focused on using RealNetworks
products. The RealForum is a place to post messages about the best methods
for creating content using RealNetworks technologies and the planning and
implementation of streaming-media web sites.


From: "Fred Kovach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: low bandwidth encoding

Has anyone ever done a low bandwidth comparison at 28.8 between 160x120 and
240x180?  Especially in respect to starting and stopping for buffering?

I want to try encoding a 160x120 video for our 28.8 viewers and use the
system-bandrate switch in SMIL, if there will be an improvement.  If not, I
would much rather let G2 handle my multiple bandwidths with one 240x180
file.

I and Dennis (I am sure) will appreciate any input.

Fred Kovach
ICI University
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webpage: http://www.loclnet.com/kovach

 >> > From: "Dennis Lembree" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >> > Subject: low bandwidth encoding
 >> >
 >> > Hello all:
 >> >
 >> > I am having problems with low-bandwidth users viewing my
 >>.smil video
 >> > presentation. I am encoding the 28k-targeted .rm file at
 >>16kbps and the
 >> > 56k-targeted .rm file at 32kbps. The two graphics and .rt
 >>files are only 1k
 >> > each.
 >> > The ISDN and T1 files work just fine.
 >> >
 >> > At what target bitrate is everyone encoding for videos?
 >> > What rates are being used in the .smil switch tags for videos?
 >> >
 >> > Any ideas on how to make the streaming better for
 >>low-bandwidth users? (At
 >> > least until the bandwidth explosion finally arrives!) The
 >>pre-roll also
 >> > seems to be abnormally long (20-35 seconds) for the low-bandwidths.
 >> >
 >> > http://www.careertv.net/ram/ctv-pilot.ram
 >> >
 >> > Any feedback is appreciated!
 >> > -Dennis Lembree


If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with the following
command in the body of your email message:

    unsubscribe realforum

or from another account, besides the address you subscribed with:

    unsubscribe realforum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to