In some projects I've been working on (independent of any formal 'work' environment), the project head (same guy, multiple times) has pushed for publishing with the BSD license for just such reasons. Still, would anyone else be willing to re-post the materials on another site, and let us know?
--Charles PS: Don't take the: > Hmmm, perhaps that was the reference I was thinking of. My instincts > say to me that Maarten and RT have come to this decision together, > but that's just a gut feeling and could be wrong. the wrong way, Holger. Lots of independent developers are wary of The Big Corporate Entity ;) After all, we've had years of people like MS to contend with. *chuckles* > Also, keep in mind that Maarten released Rugby under the BSD license, > which basically means that anyone can use the sources for any purpose, > create derivative products (even commercial ones), include it in > other products etc., all without having to pay royalties, as long as > certain basic conditions are fulfilled (liability disclaimer, > copyright notice etc.). For a developer the BSD license is one of > the "nicest" licenses to work with, much better and less restrictive > than, e.g., GPL. So there is really nothing preventing anyone else > from picking up Rugby and continuing development on it. > > -- > Holger Kruse > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the > subject, without the quotes. > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
