> There was some discussion ongoing on one Czech server, regarding Ms.NET. > Ppl talked SOAP there, and many of them were negative about XML based > communication at all. One person told us, that they tried to use SOAP > for their solution and ended up in 1000% more complex solution ... > http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/DevelopMentor-SOAP/825909 > > Latency Performance of SOAP Implementations - > http://www.caip.rutgers.edu/TASSL/Papers/p2p-p2pws02-soap.pdf > > Soap + Apache - > http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-tp/200104/msg00098.html > > Maarten, what do you think - how would Rugby compare? :-) >
Rugby is definitely in the CORBA / RMI range performance wise. Depending on your hardware of course ;-) I think that you get fully secure Rugby for a better performance than SOAP. So for those wondering if Rugby is useful in the enterprise..... draw your own conclusions. --Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
