http://ll1.mit.edu/marshall.html
>From: Joel Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [REBOL] Re: MIT article on rebol and other languages
>Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:28:02 -0600
>
>Hi, Ladislav,
>
>Ladislav Mecir wrote:
> >
> > The continuations are like the tail recursion, they were
> > present in 1.x version, but they aren't there now.
> >
>
>Do you (or anyone else) have any information on how tail
>recursion was handled in 1.x? I'd be really interested
>in anything available...
>
> >
> > As opposed to the tail recursion, nobody
> > seems to be missing them...
> >
>
>With all due respect to present company, perhaps it's due
>to the fact that continuations are not that well known.
>TRY covers some of the common uses, but there are still
>interesting applications (I think of things like Rugby...)
>
>Again, just for my own edification, I'd really appreciate
>anything anyone has on how that was done/appeared in 1.x.
>
>-jn-
>
>--
>; sub REBOL {}; sub head ($) {@_[0]}
>REBOL []
># despam: func [e] [replace replace/all e ":" "." "#" "@"]
>; sub despam {my ($e) = @_; $e =~ tr/:#/.@/; return "\n$e"}
>print head reverse despam "moc:xedef#yleen:leoj" ;
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
>subject, without the quotes.
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
