At 21.27 24/02/02, Mark wrote: >Having read Joe Marshall's cons regarding continuations I don't think it was >necessary to throw the baby out with the bath water in the change over to REBOL 2.x >when we lost continuations and tail call optimisation.
The fact that REBOL 1.x was 10 to 100 times slower doesn't count? Regards, Gabriele. -- Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer Amigan -- AGI L'Aquila -- REB: http://web.tiscali.it/rebol/index.r -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
