Hi, Brett 10-03-2002 04:02:51, "Brett Handley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi > >> User Error: Server error: tcp 226 Quotas on: using 0.00 of 10.00 MegaBytes > >Try this line and repeat your tests: > > do http://www.codeconscious.com/rebsite/rebol-library/patches.r ok, here goes (fresh rebol session): >> do %/c/rebol/patches.r == {Replace DEBASE to avoid crash - Applied. ctx-text/back-field to cycle properly - Applied. FTP Scheme for 226 multiline server r... >> ftp-dir: ftp://<user>:<pass>@<url>/path/ >> trace/net on >> print read join ftp-dir ["file.txt"] URL Parse: <user> <pass> <url> none path/ file.txt Net-log: ["Opening" "tcp" "for" "FTP"] Net-log: [ none ["220" "230"]] Net-log: {220 ProFTPD 1.2.1 Server (<server>)} Net-log: [ ["USER" port/user] "331"] Net-log: "331 Password required for <user>." Net-log: [ ["PASS" port/pass] "230"] Net-log: "230 Welcome to <server>" Net-log: [ "SYST" "*"] Net-log: "215 UNIX Type: L8" Net-log: [ ["PORT" port/locals/active-check] "200"] Net-log: "200 PORT command successful." Net-log: [ ["CWD" either empty? port/path ["./"] [join "./" port/path]] "250"] Net-log: "250 CWD command successful." Net-log: [ ["TYPE A"] ["200"]] Net-log: "200 Type set to A." Net-log: [ [join "LIST " port/target] ["150" "125"]] Net-log: {150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for file list.} Net-log: [ none "226"] Net-log: "226-Transfer complete." Net-log: [ ["PORT" port/locals/active-check] "200"] ** User Error: Server error: tcp 226 Quotas on: using 0.00 of 10.00 MegaBytes ** Near: print read join ftp-dir ["file.txt"] Nope. Same error. But not to worry, this has a happy ending. :-) I checked if it really applied it (fresh rebol session): >> print do http://www.codeconscious.com/rebsite/rebol-library/patches.r Replace DEBASE to avoid crash - Applied. ctx-text/back-field to cycle properly - Applied. FTP Scheme for 226 multiline server response bug - Not Applied. and it didn't. >If fixes a bug in the FTP scheme that handles response 226. >The bug does not exist in some later versions of Rebol. Which is why it doesn't apply the 226 patch. I checked my Rebol/View version >> system/version == 1.2.1.3.1 Then I peeked at your code and changed the minimum version number from 1.2.0.255.255 to 1.2.1.255.255 so the patch would be applied to Rebol/view. After that the 226 error was gone! Thanks for your help everyone. :-) Regards, Henrik Mikael Kristensen -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
