> Maarten Koopmans wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) > > I have used it extensively under Linux, but.... > > > > - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen > > - it is *slow* > > > > OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based > > mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and > > has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the > > built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. > > I haven't done any testing myself yet, but if it is so, it's pretty ... > ehm .... Our company paind 700 USD for /Command, which does not seem to > be up-to-date enough to compete with free implementation? I think that > once DocKimbel releases his free FastCGI protocol, someone else does > ODBC library wrapper and there is no reason anymore for anyone to buy > /Command, as everything else is in View/Pro ... ;-) ... ah .... I forgot > there is no Core/Pro, so Unix users would still be required to buy > Command, because of that X11 gfx thing .... > > -pekr- > > > I did an ODBC-wrapper in Command1.0 times and from time to time I am still using it with /View or Command2.0, as it is more flexible than the native implementation.
But I think it has a few memory flaws and is not made according Rebol/port conventions. I have a tcp/ip connection to the Cache ODBC&JDBC-server port too. If anyone wants to clean them up... AR -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
