From: "Carl Read" > One possible improvement in the creation of the rule would be to allow > for some of the strings in blocks to be treated as a collection of > seperate characters, perhaps by using a different string datatype to > string!, such as file!. So that instead of this... > > ["a" "b" "c" "ch" "d" "e"] > > we could have... > > [%abc "ch" %de] > > Though it'd probably be better round the other way. What would be the > best string datatype for such a job?
It's not immediately obvious to me. Maybe something will become obvious with some thought. --Scott Jones -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
