On 11-Dec-03, Ingo Hohmann wrote:

> Hi Carl,

> depends on how you define simpler ...

>>> error? set/any 'err try [1 / 0]
> == true
>>> error? set/any 'err try [print ""]

> == false

> I just assume that using set/any fits for your definition ;-)

Thanks Ingor - it does.  And it was what I was trying to think of,
having seen it before, but just couldn't remember how it was done...

-- 
Carl Read

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list, just send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the subject.

Reply via email to