In the discussion about handling "untrusted" data, I noticed that
Gabriele used "to block!" whilst Sunanda used to "to-block". I'm trying
to understand if this is just a matter of personal preference or there
is a real difference.
On my machine, to block! appears to be at least 15 percent quicker than
to-block as shown by the following timing test. The test isn't very
accurate because I had other applications loaded on the machine at the
time. I did run a loop of 25 timing tests and to block! was always
quicker.
Regards
Peter
>> speedy: [
[ time-to-block: make time! 0
[ time-to: make time! 0
[
[ loop 100 [
[ start: now/time/precise
[ loop 1000 [ to-block "12345" ]
[ end: now/time/precise
[ time-to-block: time-to-block + end - start
[
[ start: now/time/precise
[ loop 1000 [ to block! "12345" ]
[ end: now/time/precise
[ time-to: time-to + end - start
[ ] ; end loop 100
[ print [ "average time for to-block" (time-to-block / 100) ]
[ print [ "average time for to block!" (time-to / 100) ]
[ ]
== [
time-to-block: make time! 0
time-to: make time! 0
loop 100 [
start: now/time/precise
loop 1000 ...
>> do speedy
average time for to-block 0:00:00.0067641
average time for to block! 0:00:00.00569063
>> do speedy
average time for to-block 0:00:00.00674169
average time for to block! 0:00:00.00503805
>> do speedy
average time for to-block 0:00:00.00682156
average time for to block! 0:00:00.00574013
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to rebol-request
at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
