Hi Arie,
If you had other functions in the object
which also used the rule, then it would
make sense to share the rule in the way
Volker suggested:
parse input bind rule 'res
which binds to the function's context (using
the local word 'res as the known-word).
If there's only ever going to be one function,
then you might as well make all your rules
be defined in the function body as locals, then
you can probably dispense with the enclosing
object altogether!
The fact that you did put the function in an
object to start with makes me think you did want
to share some parts like the rule...
Anton.
> Hi Volker,
>
> obviously I had a wrong view on these things.
> To better understand it I now moved RULE from outside to inside the
> function and then it works properly, because the words are bound to the
> function context.
> Your suggestion to put all these variables right in the object (outside
> the function) is also OK.
>
> Thanks for helping me understand that great miracle called REBOL a bit
> more again!
>
> Kind regards,
> Arie
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
