Maybe my view on tutorials and documentation is a little bit different. I like Rebol's help, source and what and mostly I am contented with the dictionary. Mostly they offer what I am looking for in Core. Of course that's not enough with View.
I am shy with programs with more documentation than code. If you ever had to work with a program with incorrect documentation , maybe you will understand that. I believe that a good choice of names, a clear syntax, formatting and indentation is more essential than abundant comments. I use comments mostly if there are exceptions and/or something unexpected. What annoys me about Rebol is, that there are some flaws or bugs, I can not correct, even if I think, that I know how to do it. In this case I hardly care, if the result would be incompatible with other OS's. I am pretty sure, that more people would jump on the waggon, if the source of rebol would be available. If RT does not like the corrections and enhancements, they are in no way obliged to include it in the official releases. But I am sure, that bugs would be faster eliminated and the integration of wanted features would be sooner achieved. I think it is more important to have the source available. Then we will have more adepts and probably we will get more documentation too. AR -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
