That's what I thought. >> type? :+ == op!
>> type? :add == action! I think the op!s are more fundamental. They probably get defined first or are earlier in the symbol lookup list. I'm only speculating but it could be something like that. Anton. > BB> May seem strange, because first option must be internally > translated, but > BB> it's faster then 'add. > > >>> x: now/time/precise loop 10000000 [1 + 1] probe now/time/precise - x > BB> 0:00:02.719 > BB> == 0:00:02.719 > >>> x: now/time/precise loop 10000000 [add 1 1] probe now/time/precise - x > BB> 0:00:03.86 > BB> == 0:00:03.86 > > The reason is that + is somewhat treated like a keyword, while ADD > is not. > > Regards, > Gabriele. -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
