On 9/3/05, Ladislav Mecir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >=20 > Volker Nitsch napsal(a): >=20 > >On 9/3/05, Ladislav Mecir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As I said, there *are* exceptions: >=20 > abc: func [:x] [abs x] > abc -4 + -5 ; =3D=3D -1 >=20 Agreed, and=20 abc: func ['x] [abs x]=20 But these are intended. Maybe we use different meanings for "exceptions"? To me they are "watch out", hard to explain, surprising things. While rebols follows IMHO some simple, but not that obvious rules. Which i tried to explain. 'x and :x in argument-lists say "dont look further". That operator-evaluation is not applied then seems reasonable to me. But yes, these are exceptions. (actually i never used :x, its like 'x with a little difference (hmm, =3D exception ;) i guess?) > -L > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. >=20 >=20 --=20 -Volker "Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of indirection. But that usually will create another problem." David Wheeler -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
