*shrug* Turning on padding didn't work either, but I did notice
something else. If I run the same string through the same port, I get
different responses each time, as shown below. This can't be right, can
it? I don't know if this has anything to do with my problem at hand,
but it may.
Thanks,
rwd
>> my-port: make port! [
[ scheme: 'crypt
[ algorithm: 'blowfish
[ direction: 'encrypt
[ key: to-binary
"qachafU&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[ init-vector: to-binary "11111111"
[ padding: true
[ ]
>> set-modes my-port [binary: true lines: false]
>> open my-port
>> insert my-port "test test test"
>> update my-port
>> values: copy my-port
== #{7B36C60D60C146E91A91868115B1A5D3}
>> insert my-port "test test test"
>> update my-port
>> values: copy my-port
== #{76E20E01D30A5B210D76DBA885A160F4}
>> insert my-port "test test test"
>> update my-port
>> values: copy my-port
== #{41CCF10AE4FFC53A8C5E772F738FBC98}
>> insert my-port "test test test"
>> update my-port
>> values: copy my-port
== #{950EA14448B2BC0D2437E29FACEBD9EB}
Ladislav Mecir wrote:
>I am not totally sure, but it looks, that your Java implementation uses
>padding with spaces? If that is the case, you have to use the same
>padding for Rebol to obtain the same result.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
