Callbacks are supported by rebol of course to use it in library calls you need to have /pro /command.
Im know this will break the cross plataform independence, this is why im researching on XPCOM technology because i found it to be better and open source !. still not massively used we all know greko lib for mozilla... so i think RT have to take a look to this new concepts. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Ed O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Re: COM Supporting in rebol. Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mail.rebol.net ([209.167.34.210]) by MC6-F38.hotmail.com withMicrosoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:43:13 -0700 Received: from mail.rebol.net (mail.rebol.net [209.167.34.210])by mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9E426E;Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list rebol); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59 -0400(EDT) Received: from gs5.inmotionhosting.com (www.rebol.com [216.193.197.238])by mail.rebol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790FC420Efor <[email protected]>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:42:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [66.249.82.196] (port=14255 helo=xproxy.gmail.com)by gs5.inmotionhosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52)id 1EUQx3-0000Lg-7rfor [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:43:01 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s19so239360wxc for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.29.4 with SMTP id c4mr4287357wxc; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.110.16 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) > >I like the concept, but unfortunately I haven't been able to run the >sample code in a version of Command/View. Not sure if it's a version >problem or something else. (error says " Invalid argument: callback!") > >Reminds me of some of the capabilities that Ruby supports natively. >See article referenced at: >http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/61035 > >Although it runs counter to the platform-independence dogma, it would >be interesting if Carl reviewed and gave an opinion on his blog. As it >currently stands, I imagine that developers requiring any kind of >Windows integration or widgetry steer far clear of REBOL (with similar >issues on OS X). > >Ed > >On 10/22/05, Benjamin Maggi wrote: >> >>I've been working in a project to add supporting for COM objects in REBOL= >, >>it requires /pro /command to work because it uses a DLL to perform >>calls. >>The idea of this project is to provide REBOL's the ability to "talk" to C= >OM >>objects not just a few one's but to all >>kind of COM object ... >>the examples show using Office automation, Windows Management >>Instrumentation(WMI) and Internet explorer. but you can use COMLib >>to perform other COM automation tasks, like Speech API, wizard and more, = >If >>you have to do COM interfacing try this one ! >> >>The project still remains an alpha testing stage. im working on ! >>Feedbacks are welcome. >>You can also find a discussion board on AltMe REBOL3, search for "COM >>supporting" group >> >>Benjamin. >-- >To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to >lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nuevo MSN Messenger Una forma rápida y divertida de enviar mensajes[1] --- Links --- 1 http://g.msn.com/8HMBESAR/2743??PS=47575 -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
