On 11/15/05, Kai Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Kai, > > On Saturday, November 12, 2005, 10:05:00 PM, you wrote: > > KP> Why did my client run into an exception instead of returning a clean > KP> service result of type "fail" as the documentation says it would? > > Because WAIT-SERVICE throws an error when it gets a "fail" result. > (Actually, anything except 'done.) > > Regards, > Gabriele. > -- > > Thanks again, Gabriele ~ > > so as it stands, this is not half as usable then as the documentation > had me believe... > > Naturally, I'd like it to work as described in the outdated > documentation, with clean > failure indicator(s) in the service result and not throwing errors at > the client side. > > Are there any plans to change that behavior? Any way to circumvent this > for the time being? > > Thanks, > Kai > -- > To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to > lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject. > >
Why? if i dont miss something, thats like missing files, bad data format etc is handled too? it throws an error, and if you dont like it, use attempt[read something] -- -Volker "Any problem in computer science can be solved with another layer of indirection. But that usually will create another problem." David Wheeler -- To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
