* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051122 07:43]:
>
> Tim:
>
> > Major revisions can be headaches, methinks.
>
> Larry Wall uses an even stronger term: for PERL, it's the apocalypse.
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2004/04/16/a12.html
Apocalypse huh? Perl 6.0 has been in the can so long, I sometimes
wonder if it is "apocryphal" <wink>
> But minor revisions can be headaches too....
Tell me about it!
cniweb is a very rebol friendly hoster, and hosts a number of
different rebol users. We had a panic attack in March of 2003 when the
hoster upgraded rebol and scripts were breaking *everywhere*
But as soon as he restored the original, all was good and he hasn't
dared to do an upgrade since.....
Sorry, - I can't remember what was breaking...
But a pre-2003 binary lives on the machines hosting the virtual
domains for that hoster.
tim
> ....REBOL.org, which runs purely on REBOL/Core, is a version or two behind
> current /Core releases. Why? Minor incompatibilities that we haven't yet
> tracked
> down across 120+ scripts would break too many things....
>
> .... And it's starting to matter as it is not always possible to even load
> the headers of scripts written for later versions. Example:
>
> http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=gismo.r&color=
> yes
>
> The script is not rendered in color as it crashes our attempts to parse it
> with the version of Core we run.
>
> Backwards and forwards compatibility should be goals of any language intended
> to support applications with a life time measuring more than a few months.
>
> Sunanda.
> --
> To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
> lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
--
Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.alaska-internet-solutions.com
--
To unsubscribe from the list, just send an email to
lists at rebol.com with unsubscribe as the subject.
