just to show the airy fairy stargazing "lofteaze-tipflopsical" resolutioning and 
'prebumbling' is in vogue and coming at one from all sides I give you another example.

http://upf.org/thefed.htm  Unified Planetary Assembly


funny thing I just found out:

the fuckers didn't even sustain their efforts very far past the preamble; most links 
are empty or skeletal at best, here's another bit though (last update a year ago):

United Citizens Advocates
           Global Virtual Assembly


One might think that another effort to support the development of a peoples assembly 
would seem
redundant, but the UPF is working closely with any effort that supports world peace. 
On November
7-9, 1997, the UPF contributed its research and experience to the World Peace movement 
by
organising a United Peoples Advocates and Global Virtual Assembly Conference in 
Chicago IL,
USA. This conference has helped to unify and distill the various movements that 
support the creation
of peoples assemblies.

While the United Nations itself seems too weak to bring about rapid change in terms of 
the
elimination of global problems, there are movements toward creating a Citizens 
(Peoples) Assembly
that will strengthen the existence of a viable globally governing empowerment and help 
pressure
nation-states to fulfil their commitments, obligations, and responsibilities to a 
better future. Any and
all forms of peoples assemblies must be truly representative and legitimately 
empowered by those
involved. Not only is empowerment an issue, but funding is a valid concern and would 
not come
substantially from the UN because of its already tight budget. Some of the funding 
might come from
NGOs and the large metropolitan cities of the world as well as from national 
governments and
international corporations. Because new sources of revenue are needed to boost the UN, 
these
sources could also contribute to a peoples assembly that would exist as a parallel to 
the UN general
assembly, but not 100% within the UN's walls. Although not entirely direct outgrowths 
of the present
day UN, peoples assemblies might be a combination of efforts inside and outside of the 
UN, both
physically and virtually. 

The main argument for a Citizens Assembly would be to accelerate the transition from a 
world of
competition to one of cooperation. Although, logically, a peoples assembly would be 
the result of
NGO involvement with both the UN and the world's largest metropolitan cities, it must 
also be the
result of ideas and opinions of all the Earth's people. This is exactly why a viable 
peoples assembly
must not only include efforts both in and out of the UN, but also include both a 
virtual as well as
physical presence in the form of a Global Virtual Assembly. The UPF began to 
facilitate a GVA's
existence with the cooperation of those on the world.gov mailing list when an election 
for a board to
coordinate a virtual peoples assembly protocol was held. Ultimately, everyone would be 
able to input
into the structure and function of a viable Citizens Assembly. This Conference 
represented the first
step toward a viable Unified Planetary Assembly, in whatever form it will eventually 
take. The next
step, which will be represented by a second conference next year, is to promote the 
idea of an
Advisory Council as a viable "Third House". A meeting of the Chicagoland (Calumet) 
Citizens
Peoples Assembly is being planned for November 1998. Of course, these ideas are open 
to debate
by anyone who wishes to contribute.

In addition to the UPF, there are a number of NGOs working toward viable peoples 
assemblies
including CAMDUN, Earth Council, Earth Action, and ACGC. The concept of a peoples 
assembly
has been variously referred to as a "Global Peoples Assembly", a "UN Peoples 
Assembly", a "UN
Citizens Assembly", a "United Peoples Assembly", and a "Peoples Advocates Council". We 
must
help to create a viable Citizens Assembly by definition that would exist as a direct 
outgrowth of the
people on this planet. It would seem very logical for such a movement to include 
efforts that support
both an evolution of the UN and a revolution of the people. Why can we not marry these 
two efforts
to facilitate a viable overarching peoples assembly movement? With the increasing 
involvement of
NGOs in the UN, one could say that a prototype of a Citizens Assembly already exists 
through its
structure, yet it cannot be described as a truly democratically elected entity. It is 
for this reason that
we must go beyond the present model to include any and all opinions. The time has come 
for the
voices of all the Earth's peoples to be heard. It is our hope that the information 
gathered from this
Peace Conference will help facilitate the eventual existence of a viable peoples 
assembly, with both
physical and virtual components, by distilling and combining the findings of all the 
efforts that support
a Citizens Assembly, in whatever final form it will take.

 Freedoms, Rights,and Responsibilities Council          Economic Equity and 
Development Council
Weaponry and Armed Forces Council
Global Institutions and International Relations Council
       Technological Applications Council
   Environmental Conservation Council
              Anti-Violence Council


encore:
an even more emaciated and skeletal effort in this direction is:
514 The Peoples' Virtual Assembly -- Status of Pilot Projec
<!-- --> Peoples' Virtual Assembly Status of Pilot Project The initial board has been 
selected by the GRASSROOTS W
  http://www.ionet.net/~dwaddell/status.html (Lycos) 
it points to a listserv which is not to be found (upon my first try):
http://www.webcom.com/worldgov


HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

Reply via email to