Dear Tim,
Don't take this wrong now, but I think you've taken Meg Lees' comments out
of context, and the text doesn't support your implications. I'm not a Lees
fan; 'Tasha's my kind of gal, but I believe we hurt our cause more than help
it by falling into the same trap of misrepresentation as do the Libs don't
you? So let's be fair here and not hang Lees for what she *didn't* say and
stick to hanging her for that which she *has said or done*.
cheers,
Suzie
>Meg Lees makes some Interesting comments in the article below (reproduced
from the newsclips):
>
>Senator Lees said "it is through tax that we get messages across about how
we would like people to behave".
>"We will have major problems with any watering down of human rights, and
any erosion of environmental powers. Our bottom line on our core values
remains intact. Nothing has changed ..."
>
>Core values?! She really has been spending too much time with Howard. And
I'm all sure we're all glad to hear she will have "major problems" with
watering down human rights. "Major problems" doesn't exactly sound like the
same thing as "we will never water down human rights". Maybe they aren't a
core value?
>
>Tim
-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words: unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission
from the
copyright owner for purposes of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
