The Sydney Morning Herald
Liberals have lost their conscience

Date: 18/03/00

Late last year Amnesty International wrote to Philip Ruddock, the
Minister for Immigration, and asked that he no longer wear his AI
lapel badge when speaking in his capacity as Federal minister.

The private letter cited Amnesty's "fundamental opposition" to the
minister's treatment of refugees. It did not want him identified in any
way with Amnesty when he announced or defended his hard-hearted
policies.

Yet Ruddock is supposedly part of the conscience of the Liberal Party,
the liberal Left who identify themselves with a small "l" and call
themselves the moderates. In days gone by he was a fiery spirit, too,
who has crossed the floor to oppose John Howard's 1988
pronounce-ment that Australia should alter the ethnic mix of its
migration program.

But that was then. Now, Ruddock not only runs an immigration policy
which Amnesty condemns, he also was all but invisible this week
when the Government stymied all attempts to override the Northern
Territory's mandatory sentencing laws, which Amnesty also
condemns.

Also silent was Robert Hill, Minister for the Environment, and once also
a man whose conscience repeatedly put him on the opposite
side of the chamber from his conservative Liberal colleagues. So too
Justice Minister Amanda Vanstone and Attorney-General Daryl
Williams (who should both be directly concerned by Australian breaches
of international law). Not to mention John Fahey, Joe Hockey
and Michael Wooldridge, all ministers who have identified themselves in
the past with the moderates and progressive social policy.

The Liberal moderates have faded away like summer dew. Over the past 10
or 15 years, many have been driven from the party, either
dumped by the Right at preselection time or given up in disgust. The
right-wing headkickers, led by Michael Kroger in Victoria, John
Howard and Bronwyn Bishop in NSW, Nick Minchin in South Australia and
Noel Crichton-Browne in WA, have purged many, and
co-opted most of the rest. The silence of the ministers was proof.

Yesterday, the Herald rang most of the remaining moderates. It doesn't
take long. Even by the estimates of the small core who remain,
they only number about 10 at most.

Mandatory sentencing is a clear-cut human rights issue. The laws which
mandatorily jail juveniles in Western Australia and more
particularly in the NT breach multiple human rights agreements to which
Australia is a signatory, are opposed by virtually the entire legal
community up to High Court level as a travesty of justice, and are
opposed by the clear majority of Federal politicians.

Yet opposition to them in the Government was led not by a moderate, but
by a social conservative who is committed to the rights of
kids, Mrs Danna Vale.

The final test, of course, is expected to come on April 10, when a new
bill, more tightly framed, to override the NT laws without
touching Western Australia, is due to come before the House. If, as
appears likely, the moderates cannot find the collective gumption to
stand up and be counted, then it will be fair to consider them dead as a
political force. They need six to cross the floor; at the moment
they can muster two or three at best.

If they can't do it, the conservative hegemony will be complete and the
Liberal Party will effectively have no liberal element left in it at
all.

Mike Seccombe

This material is subject to copyright and any unauthorised use, copying
or mirroring is prohibited.

--
*********************************
Make the Hunger Site your homepage!
http://www.thehungersite.com/index.html
*********************************


-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to