Good point Roberto. We are using the protocol, but not a specification. There was none published, so we black box reversed engineered the protocol.
Tom, This has indeed been discussed many many times on this list, as to not go too far into it I recommend that you read our statements on the wiki regarding the legality of Red5. http://osflash.org/red5/fud Let us know if you have any specific questions after you have read that document. Thanks, Chris On 5/12/06, Roberto Saccon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK, red5 is not using the RTMP specification (because such a > specification does not exist), so I don't see a problem here ... > > > On 5/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > i dont know if this was already discussed here, but is it possible that > adobe/macromedia stopps > > this project cause red5 is using the RTMP specification?! > > > > What happed if a commercial company , example a hosting company , uses > red5 for commercial > > flash streaming hosting. Is that a problem ? > > > > Please developer and authors make this situation clear for us. > > > > Does anyone knows (in their family) a laywer that can help us to > understand such kind of > > software situations?! > > > > thank you very very much! > > > > Regards > > Tom, Germany > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > Roberto Saccon > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
