On 5/25/06, 李文华 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You request is sensible. One thing I am thinking about for a long time is that if the new messaging structure can fit well with streaming, why not extend it for SharedObject? If the app needs 1:1 conversation, we just need to set up a filter or a private pipeline for messaging.
Ok this thread may well be sent to the dev list because the design issues need to be discussed further.
Hi all：
Now I know the way share object to notify all client user online,and all
user can receive the message anyone send, but a question bother me a long
time about how can I send a message go through red5 sever to one person
online , and we establish new shareobject for these two person? I do not
think so, but how can I do? Can anyone tell me the way to solve my problem?
Maybe sample code for me is better! Thks all
You request is sensible. One thing I am thinking about for a long time is that if the new messaging structure can fit well with streaming, why not extend it for SharedObject? If the app needs 1:1 conversation, we just need to set up a filter or a private pipeline for messaging.
Ok this thread may well be sent to the dev list because the design issues need to be discussed further.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 代表
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
发送时间: 2006年5月25日 0:00
收件人: [email protected]
主题: Red5 Digest, Vol 9, Issue 98
Send Red5 mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Red5 digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: sendMessage bug? (Joachim Bauch)
2. Re: sendMessage bug? (Dominick Accattato)
3. Re: sendMessage bug? (Dominick Accattato)
4. Re: sendMessage bug? (Joachim Bauch)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:51:07 +0200
From: Joachim Bauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Red5] sendMessage bug?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi Dominick,
Dominick Accattato wrote:
> Tom, you point out some valid points. SharedObject.sendMessage () should
> send that message to all clients connected to that sharedObject.
>
> which version of Red5 are you using?
He's using the trunk as "so.addSharedObjectListener" is not available in
0.4.1 ;) I'm assuming there might be some scope issue with the server and
the clients connecting to the SOs at different scopes and thus getting
different SOs.
Joachim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url :
http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20060524/578ed184/
smime-0001.bin
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:21:27 -0400
From: "Dominick Accattato" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Red5] sendMessage bug?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
gotcha!
On 5/24/06, Joachim Bauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> Hi Dominick,
>
> Dominick Accattato wrote:
> > Tom, you point out some valid points. SharedObject.sendMessage() should
> > send that message to all clients connected to that sharedObject.
> >
> > which version of Red5 are you using?
>
> He's using the trunk as "so.addSharedObjectListener" is not available in
> 0.4.1 ;) I'm assuming there might be some scope issue with the server and
> the clients connecting to the SOs at different scopes and thus getting
> different SOs.
>
> Joachim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20060524/43758a6f/
attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 09:22:57 -0400
From: "Dominick Accattato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: Re: [Red5] sendMessage bug?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I was wondering because in 0.4.1, there is no method with the signature
getSharedObject(scope,"flashSO");
only
getSharedObject(String name);
;)
On 5/24/06, Dominick Accattato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> gotcha!
>
> On 5/24/06, Joachim Bauch < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dominick,
>
> Dominick Accattato wrote:
> > Tom, you point out some valid points. SharedObject.sendMessage ()
> should
> > send that message to all clients connected to that sharedObject.
> >
> > which version of Red5 are you using?
>
> He's using the trunk as "so.addSharedObjectListener" is not available in
> 0.4.1 ;) I'm assuming there might be some scope issue with the server and
> the clients connecting to the SOs at different scopes and thus getting
> different SOs.
>
> Joachim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Red5 mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20060524/64d0841f/
attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 16:05:45 +0200
From: Joachim Bauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Red5] sendMessage bug?
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi Dominick,
Dominick Accattato wrote:
> I was wondering because in 0.4.1, there is no method with the signature
> getSharedObject(scope,"flashSO" );
>
> only
>
> getSharedObject(String name );
yep, that was part of the new implementation of the SO-Service in the trunk
I told you yesterday. The SO-Service is a singleton in the trunk,
configured
in a bean and can be used for every scope, thus the scope is passed as
parameter to it.
Joachim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url :
http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20060524/accc46f4/
smime-0001.bin
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
End of Red5 Digest, Vol 9, Issue 98
***********************************
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
--
Best Regards
Steven Gong
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
