The Red5 project really is great. Just one thing comes to my mind if I read this. Don't use Flex but use OpenLaszlo, then there's no need for FDS. And why do you as an OSFlash project choose to build the Admin Console with Flex and not OpenLaszlo? That would be a great step. I would even join the Admin Console team if you'd decide to do that.
Thanks to the whole team for delivering such a cool open source technology. :) Raju > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag > von João Saleiro > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 01:44 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Red5] FDS > > !!!!!!!!!!!!! :D > > No words!! You guys are great! > > :) > > Chris Allen wrote: > > It's funny when both project leaders aren't on the same page. That > > very rarely happens with John and me, but it does happen, as in this > > case. > > > > Anyway, I'm really hoping that we do come up with a decent FDS > > alternative soon. I think that we are most of the way there and there > > is a huge demand for it. FDS in many ways isn't all that different > > than Red5 as it is now (the ability to tap into other APIs through > > Spring, not JMS, ability to push binary objects over RTMP, etc...). > > All that really needs to happen is the implementation of AMF3 and > > hooking up to the Flex end with data binding. Okay, so I'm > > over-simplifying this a bit, but this is certainly a real and viable > > possibility. > > > > The Admin Console team has been looking down that road. With the > > creation of our new Flex 2 based admin console, we are hoping to begin > > the process of adding some great things to make building Flex > > applications easier with Red5. All of the code for the admin console > > will be open source of course, and we hope that it will be a decent > > working example for others to follow. > > > > Now with this said, getting 0.6 out the door is a HUGE priority and > > definitely takes precedence. I just don't think it's as far off as > > John is saying. > > > > -Chris > > > > > > On 12/11/06, John Grden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hey Joao, right now, our focus is to get V0.6 to a final version and to > >> complete our stated roadmap. > >> > >> There have been alot of requests for AMF3 and though we've had some > >> development started on that, we've not really pushed for it right now > given > >> all of the other todo's and issues we have to work on. I know that's > not > >> really your question, but it does have some relevance to a future > >> alternative FDS that would come out of Red5. > >> > >> For the future, I guess its really a matter of need that'll drive > whether or > >> not there's a decent alternative to FDS out there. But as of right now, > >> we've not really looked down that road at all. > >> > >> I hope that helps, > >> > >> John > >> > >> > >> On 12/11/06, João Saleiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> do you think that there is a possibility that someday Red5 will be a > >>> replacement for the Flex Data Services 2, with the Flex Data > Management > >>> Services features (data synchronization via data push, etc)? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> João Saleiro > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Red5 mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> [ JPG ] > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Red5 mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
