It takes care of threads trying to access the same resource. The method is synchronized and all locks and mutexes are taken care of by the JAVA runtime. Much more convenient than doing threading and resource management in C.
On 3/13/07, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ive seen the statement before way over my head though http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2004/08/02/sync1.html joseph wamicha wrote: > You may try using JAVA "synchronized" methods. > > On 3/13/07, Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Im also interested aswell, im also filling a hashmap with values to >> fudge the FMS virtual directories feature, but applied in the >> filenamegenerator bean for now. Im wondering what the most safe and >> efficient way to add these values are ? >> >> public void setVirtualDirectories(String virtualDirectories) { >> vdirectories = new HashMap<String,String>(); >> directories = virtualDirectories.split(","); >> for (int i = 0; i < directories.length; i++) { >> directories[i] = directories[i].trim(); >> String[] paths = directories[i].split(";"); >> >> if (!paths[0].equals("") && !paths[1].equals("")) >> { >> vdirectories.put(paths[0], paths[1]); >> } >> } >> } >> >> public String generateFilename(IScope scope, String name, >> String extension, GenerationType type) { >> String filename; >> >> filename = playbackPath + name; >> >> String[] paths = name.split("/"); >> >> >> if ((vdirectories.size() > 0) && vdirectories.containsKey(paths[0])) >> { >> filename = vdirectories.get(paths[0]) + paths[1]; >> } >> >> log.info("Generated FilePath: " + filename); >> return filename; >> >> } >> >> the first path is split from the filename. >> >> properties setting >> >> virtualDirectories=dir1;file:C:/somedir, dir2;file:D:/somedir >> >> >> Sam Bou wrote: >> > Is Red5 single or multi-threaded? I noticed that in >> http://mirror1.cvsdude.com/trac/osflash/red5/changeset/1732 that the >> default is multi-threaded but I'm not sure if that is only for the IO >> processes or for other processes as well. >> > >> > If it's multi-threaded, as a Java newbie I'm wondering if I need to >> synchronize the appConnect and other methods if I have something like >> the >> following, where many connections will be accessing the same variables >> clientCount and clientsMap: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > public class Application extends ApplicationAdapter { >> > >> > private int clientCount = 0; >> > >> > private Map<String, List<String>> clientsMap = new HashMap<String, >> List<String>>(); >> > >> > public boolean appConnect(IConnection conn, Object[] params) { >> > >> > clientCount++; >> > >> > clientsMap.put(clientId, clientInfoList); >> > } >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Any advice appreciated. >> > >> > Sam >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
-- C is forever.
_______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
