Yes, and the lighting has changed outside, so I think the video probably looks better.
Andrew Herron wrote: > Hi again, > > Well I can't see any noticeable improvement since you moved to a wired > connection from your laptop to your router. Still about the same > amount of choppiness... but you did adjust the camera directions ;-) > > Andrew > > On 4/25/07, *Interalab* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I tried the changes to the bandwidth beans, but the stream wouldn't > start after. So, I rolled back and now it's back. > > The other thing I realized was that the laptop we were publishing the > camera from was on a wireless network connection. I switched it > to the > wired router and now all the bandwidth numbers look much better. > > Any change on the dropped frames and choppiness? > > Regards, > Bill > > Andrew Herron wrote: > > Ok now the stream is back and visible again. The picture quality is > > much better now (not over exposed at all) but we are still > seeing 5-6 > > secs of smotth frame rate and then a few dropped frames and then > > smooth frame rates again. > > > > Regards > > > > Andrew > > > > On 4/25/07, *Joachim Bauch* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > > > Hi Klaus, > > > > Klaus schrieb: > > > Check conf/red5-common.xml > > [...] > > > Remove the bean with > > org.red5.server.stream.SimpleBWControlService and > > > remove comments around the bean with DummyBWControlService. > > > > this will only change the way Red5 uses the bandwidth > settings defined > > in serverside code. > > > > Another thing you could test is changing line 1780 in > > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream from > > > > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) { > > > > to > > > > if (pendingVideos > 1) { > > > > Recompile and restart Red5 afterwards. This will change the > handling > > of slow client connections to drop less frames. However > without this > > check, I had issues with clients from low-latency, low-bandwidth > > connections. You seem to have high-latency, high-bandwidth > so maybe > > we need different checks to handle both cases. > > > > Please let me know if this helped with your problems. > > > > Joachim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > <http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Red5 mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
