:)))
nice one! signal is much better than before (yesterday's first version)
and although i have here only a 3MBit-line i get the following values:
BufferLength: 3.496
FrameRate: 19.72

it stutters a slight bit (but good enough to use it) but i guess this is
related to my line and the location (germoney)...

rock on!

henrik

btw: while i'm writing the connection seems to get more and more
stable; cool!

--
__digitalspices__
Henrik Weber  [MediaDesign&FlashDevelopment]

home:         www.digitalspices.com


Interalab wrote:
On arrival at my office, I found the laptop running fine, but the publisher movie in a non-active condition. It had failed sometime between 10 pm EDT and 6 am EDT (I'm not sure how far off from GMT we are in eastern daylight savings time, so adjust based on Andrew's observation). I refreshed the publisher browser and it immediately started streaming again. I'm not sure what to make of that. The server had no problem accepting the refreshed stream and I never lost connection to the shared objects (I'm using them to count users and a couple of other things). At the moment, I'm going to blame the camera/publisher, as there are no unexpected errors in the red5 log.

Current stats:
We've had 163 connections to the stream since yesterday at 5 pm.
Peak concurrent connections was 7 (resulting in about 1.9 Mbps in bandwidth use at the time)
Mem:    963164k total,   852984k used,   110180k free
Swap:  2819368k total,   251056k used,  2568312k free
Cpu(s):  0.3%
uptime 14:26

Streaming at 320x240, 24 fps, 80% quality, 22k audio, approx 300-400kbps publisher.

Andrew Herron wrote:
Hmmm... well I am trying to watch the stream now 06:55 GMT on Thursday and I see a brief flash and then nothing except 'Buffer length' and 'Framerate' which are both 0

It clearly was doing good things earlier so maybe the camera or your laptop have caused a problem?

Andrew

On 4/26/07, *Sales Department* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    There was a change made to the trunk (I think by Joachim) in

    >     > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream

    This line appears to have been removed.  The purpose of the
    section was to manage something to do with low latency/low
    bandwidth connections, but it seems that it also introduced some
    choppiness.  I haven't seen the hiccups since we compiled the
    latest trunk.

    >     >
    >     > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) {
    >     >

    Bill

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Dan Rossi" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:51:28 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
    Subject: Re: [Red5] live test - again

    Hi its fine now, what did you do ?

    Storm wrote:
    > It's working pretty well here (from Málaga, Spain). "BufferLength"
    > says: 1.858 all the time, and i've just noticed a few macroblocks in
    > the video by they're gone now.
    >
    > On 4/26/07, *Interalab* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
    >
    >     I have updated to the trunk revision 1932 which does not
    contain the
    >     "pending videos" code.
    >
    >     We're re-launched the live camera (pointed at the road
    again) and will
    >     leave it up all night.  Please take a look and report back on
    >     quality if
    >     you have a chance.
    >
    >     http://www.magicoast.com/media_center/embedded_player.html
    >
    >     Thanks to everyone who helped test this today.
    >
    >     I guess this was a day for testing . . .  the video
    conference and the
    >     multiple streaming tests seemed to go well too!
    >
    >     Bill
    >
    >     Al Melquist wrote:
    >     >
    >     > Video stream stopped
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > -----Original Message-----
    >     > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] *On
    >     > Behalf Of *Lenny Sorey
    >     > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:18 PM
    >     > *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >     > *Subject:* Re: [Red5] live webcam test
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Joachim,
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > I made your suggested change bellow and recompiled.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Now the streaming side seems to be back working.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Exactly what impact does this change make?
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Thanks.
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > Lenny
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > On 4/25/07, *Joachim Bauch* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    >     > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
    >     >
    >     > Hi Klaus,
    >     >
    >     > Klaus schrieb:
    >     > > Check conf/red5-common.xml
    >     > [...]
    >     > > Remove the bean with
    >     org.red5.server.stream.SimpleBWControlService and
    >     > > remove comments around the bean with DummyBWControlService.
    >     >
    >     > this will only change the way Red5 uses the bandwidth
    settings
    >     defined
    >     > in serverside code.
    >     >
    >     > Another thing you could test is changing line 1780 in
    >     > org.red5.server.stream.PlaylistSubscriberStream from
    >     >
    >     > if (pendingVideos > 1 || writeDelta[0] > writeDelta[1]) {
    >     >
    >     > to
    >     >
    >     > if (pendingVideos > 1) {
    >     >
    >     > Recompile and restart Red5 afterwards. This will change
    the handling
    >     > of slow client connections to drop less frames. However
    without
    >     this
    >     > check, I had issues with clients from low-latency,
    low-bandwidth
    >     > connections. You seem to have high-latency, high-bandwidth
    so maybe
    >     > we need different checks to handle both cases.
    >     >
    >     > Please let me know if this helped with your problems.
    >     >
    >     > Joachim
    >     >
    >     > _______________________________________________
    >     > Red5 mailing list
    >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:
    >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
    >     > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
    <http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org>
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >     >
    >     > _______________________________________________
    >     > Red5 mailing list
    >     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >     > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
    >     >
    >
    >     _______________________________________________
    >     Red5 mailing list
    >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >     http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------
    > If a man speaks in a forest and his wife is not there, is he
    still wrong?
    >
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Red5 mailing list
    > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
    >


    _______________________________________________
    Red5 mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org


    _______________________________________________
    Red5 mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org

Reply via email to