Back to Gabriele's first question: Is red5 ready for developing a commercial product that could be used by a lot of users (think 1000/1500) ?
On 4/26/07, Nic James Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yesterday i was discussing this issue (ipv6 QoS with a friend), mainly who > > and how will manage "IP flows". The standard is great and it allows > > priorities and such (meaning that livestreams should be prioritized over > > file transfers, for example). And that's a great feature to have in your > > intranet where you can control your routers and such but, how about internet > > traffic? Internet providers could just give priority to who pays the most, > > so perhaps your sever is sending a high priority datagram but in the client > > area it's being stopped just because your client's neighbourg pays a higher > > fee to his provider. > > Before we get IPv6 it is likely that most of the time most of us will > have access to several different mediums for obtaining ip packets from > the Internet: cable, telephone line, wireless (wimax) and satellite. > > If dsl providers decide that all they are gonna do with QoS is sell > it to the highest bidder I think that most of us will move to a new > access medium thus destroying their business plan. > > I think they know this (I have recently worked for a telco). > > > -- > Nic Ferrier > http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Red5 mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ Red5 mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
