On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:04:50PM +0200, Joachim Bauch wrote:
> thanks for reporting, I fixed the problem with a slightly
> different approach in r2245.
Heh. I wondered if I should have updated first.
*updates*
Hummm. Won't your version refuse to time out at all if
it never gets a pong?
if (lastPongReceived > 0 && lastPingSent - lastPongReceived > maxInactivity)
Looks like it's saying that lastPongRecieved being zero
will stop it ever timing out. No? Perhaps there's some
other code somewhere stopping that.
Anyway, good enough for my purposes. Cheers!
Adam..........
_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
