You actually have two separate variants for the same content? If thats the case, why don't you add the ftp publication target to the variant that is currently working but only has the directory publication target, and see what happens.
And if it works and the two variants are exactly the same, you do not have to have the ftp variant any longer. Henry Lu On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:04 PM, bushland25 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, the standard extension is pdf, but I thought that was the way it > should be. It is actually that for the variant that does get published > correctly. Should I change this to htm? > > On Mar 13, 1:48 am, akor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > did you set the "standard extension" in the template properties of > > your template maybe to pdf (instead of htm)? > > > > Best, > > -alex > > > > On Mar 13, 1:26 am, bushland25 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > I have a strange issue. I have two project variants, both for PDF that > > > publish to two different locations. The first location is using a > > > publication target that is simple directory transfer. That works okay. > > > The second is an FTP transfer, and although all the logs say that > > > everything is good, the PDF gets published completely blank. I know > > > that the FTP transfer process happens okay. I have determined that the > > > failure occurs when RedDot generates the temporary file on the local > > > server before it FTPs it. Any help would be appreciated. > > > > > Thanks!- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RedDot CMS Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RedDot-CMS-Users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
