>
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, JF Martinez wrote:
>
> > I have benchmarked code generated by gcc-2.95 (compiled with
> > enable-haifa option that is of dubious and perhaps negative utility on
> > the Intel architecture) as being about 25% faster than code generated
> > by egcs.
>
> You should use 2.95.2 - 2.95 has some rather serious bugs.
My message should have read 2.95.2. The point was about the
performance gain in 2.95 being big enough to consider dumping egcs
despite C++ problems.
> RPMs for 2.95.2 can be found at
> http://people.redhat.com/bero/experimental.html
>
Thank you I used Mandrake's RPM and hacked it because I didn't like it
> > But it needs still another version of libstdc++ (2.10). For programs
> > I compile with gcc-2.95 programs is it enough to recompile them or do
> > I have to recompile every C++ library?
>
> The RPM mentioned above includes a new version of libstdc++-compat, which
> provides a compatibility library for egcs 1.1.x'ish libstdc++.
>
> If you don't want to depend on libstdc++-compat, recompiling everything
> using libstdc++ is the way to go.
>
I know about libstc++-compat my problem is if I will need to recompile
Qt and every C++ based library before I begin to compile new things
using Gcc-c++.
By the way maintaing C++ libraries is becaoming a such nightmare that
I am on the verge to suggest KDE people to rewrite it in Cobol. :-)
> Also, you should upgrade binutils along with gcc 2.95.2.
>
> LLaP
> bero
>
> --
> Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM.
> -- Bill Gates, 1983
> Windows 98 requires 16 MB RAM.
> -- Bill Gates, 1999
> Nobody will ever need Windows 98.
> -- logical conclusion
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
