Your solution requires that both packages are available in binary
format. In my case one of them did not build due to the presence of the other!
Matt Wilson writes:
> The right solution:
>
> # rpm -Uvh procps-2.0.7-2.i686.rpm rusers-server-0.17-5.i386.rpm
>
> Something that concerns me about RPM users is that the don't realize
> that they can satisfy co-dependencies by upgrading to packages at
> once. I think we need a good packaging tool to help fix this.
>
> Matt
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 02:52:19PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > procps-2.0.7-2: Fails to upgrade due to rusers-server dependency
> > rpm -Uvh procps-2.0.7-2.i686.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > libproc.so.2.0.6 is needed by rusers-server-0.17-5
> >
> > rusers-0.17-6: Fails to build with two versions of
> > /lib/libproc.so.2.0.[6,7] installed
> > rpm --rebuild --target=i686 rusers-0.17-6.src.rpm
> > cc rstatd.o rstat_proc.o rstat_xdr.o /lib/libproc.so.2.0.6 libproc.so.2.0.7
> > -o rstatd
> > cc: libproc.so.2.0.7: No such file or directory
> > make: *** [rstatd] Error 1
> >
> > Solution 1: make sure only one libproc library is installed
> > rpm -e rusers-server & rebuild+reinstall procps
> >
> > Solution 2: Edit rpc.rstatd/GNUMakefile from rusers-0.17-6
> > LIBS += $(shell cd /lib && echo /lib/libproc.so.*)
> > #LIBS += /lib/$(shell cd /lib && echo libproc.so.*)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-devel-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
