Hello...
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, redhat.angus wrote:
>
<snip>
> ext3 is much better there - since it is just an extension of ext2, all the
> (very reliable by now) tools for ext2 recovery can be used.
>
> Last time I checked, reiserfs couldn't be used with software raid, and
> the format of its journal changes with every couple of releases; it's not
> (yet) what I'd call stable code.
>
> It's nice for a toy box.
>
>
>> Ultimately, include reiserfs in the next release of RedHat (8.0 ?)
>> and you will put every one of agreement.
>
>
> It will be included when/if it matures
>
> LLaP
> bero
>
We are discussing putting reiser in the rawhide tree yes? It's a
development tree, yes? Why not put in reiserfs, ext3, xfs , and jfs
(IBM). Then we can all jump in the back seat and see who puts out.
--
Christopher McCrory
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pricegrabber.com
"Linux: Because rebooting is for adding new hardware"
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
