> Matt Sturtz wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, does anybody know why RedHat doesn't ship the Intel e100
> > driver instead of the non-Intel eepro100 (not sure of author)?
> > ** what I would like to know is, where is there a list of real names/hardwa
> re
> co-references with funny names, like 'tulip'. Did some manufacturer really
> make a device/driver called tulip? Or is this just more cutsy like
> potato and zoot.
The author certainly did make a driver called "tulip." As most other drivers
have more mundane, I assume there was a reason - perhaps "Tulip" was a
development name for the chipset, like "Chicago" for Windows.
It's certainly easier to remember than the production names for the chipsets
it supports;-)
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index.
Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
